Author: Peter van Zeist

As the world transitions toward sustainable energy, the debate between nuclear power and renewables intensifies. While nuclear has long been seen as a stable energy source, the financial reality tells a different story. Massive costs, long construction times, and rigid infrastructure make nuclear power a poor investment compared to the rapidly advancing wind and solar industries.

Hinkley Point C, the UK’s newest nuclear project, will cost up to €300 billion over 60 years when including operational, fuel, and waste disposal costs. In contrast, a fully renewable alternative using 10 GW of offshore wind, 10 GW of solar, and 100 GWh of battery storage could provide the same energy for just €60 billion—a fraction of nuclear’s cost.

Nuclear power is also not a growing trend. The number of newly built reactors barely keeps up with decommissioned ones. Even France, one of the most nuclear-reliant nations, now considers it a financial disaster due to rising maintenance costs and outdated infrastructure.

Renewables are flexible, scalable, and decentralized—offering a future-proof energy solution. With advancements in storage, electric vehicles, and smart grids, the transition to renewables is not only feasible but the most cost-effective choice for the future.